Okay! This is my first post in awhile. I’ve been thinking about rewriting, thinking and rewriting and repeat. I’ve had a couple of revelations.
First, both museums I am case studying are old and new construction. This is great in comparing the thought process behind their new additions and the ADA/thoughts on universal design. George Eastmans addition in 2021 was focused on accessibility, so this is easy. But, I still haven’t heard from GCVM after multiple attempts to ask them anything. However, this goes into my second revelation.
Secondly, George Eastman is accredited by AAM and GCVM is not. A huge part of being accredited is public trust and transparency. George Eastman is showing their transparency by being forthcoming to me, and they even have a blog telling people about their additions, and constructions, etc. GCVM has a lack of transparency with the amount of times I haven’t been able to reach them. I also can’t find any information about their additions like the gallery…
…stay tuned for when I go to GCVM and try to make contact…
No comments:
Post a Comment