The ultimate goal of my thesis project is to answer the question: "Can facsimiles of museum objects help fulfill the desire of visitors to touch items on display?" In order to answer this question, I will be conducting a two-part project. In the first part, a selected object will be reproduced using 3D printing or another method available at RIT. The AMPrint Center has some interesting ways of creating objects, and depending on what I chose to reproduce, a method other than 3D printing might be best. The goal of this phase is to create a facsimile that mirrors the original object as closely as possible, from its size, to its weight, to any textures the object might have. This might not be possible given the available technology, but ideally, I would like for the reproduction to be as similar as possible to the original in order to effectively serve as a surrogate for it.
In the second phase of my project, the reproduced object will be placed on display in a local institution, alongside the original object. Visitors will be encouraged to interact with the reproduction, and a visitor study survey will be conducted into how, if at all, interacting with the object enhanced their museum experience. Did they have an initial desire to touch the original object? Did the facsimile help to fulfill that desire? Did it make the desire to hold the original object stronger?
Time permitting, I would like to do this project twice; once at an institution that tends to encourage interactivity for the visitors (such as the RMSC), and once at an institution that usually doesn't allow visitors to interact in the galleries (such as the MAG). I think this could uncover some really interesting information about what a visitor expects out of a museum visit, and how museum professionals can work to meet those expectations.
From Beth Compton: "Replicas of an ulu artifact (Ikaahuk Archaeology Project). From left to right: white 3D print, colour 3D print, handmade replica (by Tim Rast), and the original artifact excavated from Banks Island, NWT. Photograph by Beth Compton." Click here for source |
This sounds like a really interesting topic. I know there have been many times that I've been tempted to touch something in a museum, even if it was just to feel if something was as rough as it looked (like the paint layers in some paintings). I've seen a few museums that have tactile paintings for vision impaired visitors, but I'm sure there are many other visitors that would enjoy the experience as well.
ReplyDeleteI look forward to your research!
I like how you're taking your thesis one step further by not just creating a facsimile, but also seeing how it influences visitor experience. I'm looking forward to your results. I think you have a good plan, and the idea of comparing two sites (RMSC vs. MAG) is great.
ReplyDeleteI think this is an amazing idea Lizzy. I was actually just telling a friend that every time I go to a museum I jump at the chance to touch and play with things because that type of interaction is so rare. It will be fun seeing your thesis develop. Maybe you could bring in some of your 3D prints to share with the class once you get to that point!
ReplyDeleteLizzy, I look forward to seeing how you approach this project. One interesting side question is whether identical items (i.e., the facsimile) has a better result than a non-identical item (i.e., an avocado to show impasto brushstroke). In other words, does the appearance/visual matter when facilitating a desire to touch? Moreover, how can work in this arena foster accessibility and inclusion?
ReplyDelete