Thursday, April 27, 2023

Final Thesis Sbmission

 The submission of the final draft of my thesis marks the beginning of the end of my six-year long journey at RIT.  There have been many ups and downs, and at several points I did not think I would be able to reach the finish line.  Yet I have reached this milestone and it feels surreal.  This project was a massive undertaking, the biggest one in my academic career.  It presented many challenges, but I have gained so much from studying the topic of my hometown.  I have gained a new appreciation for Gloucester, its history, and its cultural heritage.  While I will miss a lot about RIT, I am excited to return home and take this new perspective with me.  


Final Thesis Reflection

​​Turning in the final thesis is a huge relief. Though it still needs to be approved, I'm glad that I've been able to make it up until this point. I am really appreciative of everyone who was involved, especially my advisors and the people I interviewed. I really enjoyed the opportunity this paper gave me to reach out to prison librarians and talk to them about their work. I initially joined Museum Studies in hopes of learning more about libraries while also applying my prior experience and knowledge as a Criminal Justice major. I'm glad that I was able to combine my two interests in my thesis and explore what I joined the MUSE program for. Though I've finished my research for now, I still have more to learn about prison libraries, and I hope that I can someday experience the impact of prison libraries in person by working in one myself.

End of the Year Reflection

    On our last day of thesis class, moments after sending in my final copy for approval, it now feels like my final year is winding to an end. While I know that I still have to finish work for my other classes and present my poster at the Capstone Conference, getting this thesis completed and submitted has been like a giant weight lifted off my shoulders. To think, at the beginning of this semester I could not imagine writing a 25-page paper about the Spanish Civil War and the Museo Reina Sofía, let alone the 64-page document (43 of which are writing) it became. It took countless hours of writing, re-writing, adding citations, inserting images, responding to feedback, and creating a SketchUp model to get to this point. While I might not have been happy in the moment writing the thesis, and in fact most of the time I was quite frustrated, it was all worth it. I am proud that I was able to finish this, and create a piece about something I am truly passionate about. While I might not want to read about the Spanish Civil War, the art works created during the time period, and the Reina Sofía for a little bit, I could definitely see it as a topic to pursue further in the future, potentially in grad school…? In all seriousness, I would not have been able to complete this thesis without the support of my advisors, Dr. Decker and Professor Monaco, and my thesis professor, Dr. Brown. Their feedback and advice helped to sharpen my thesis and get me thinking about my argument in a larger context (while also correcting a lot of run-on sentences and comma misuse). While I am glad to finally be done working on this thesis, I am a little bit sad the journey is over. No matter how much I struggled, it was a rewarding experience in the end.

Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Observing my own community from an outside perspective

In writing this paper, I find myself struggling to contain my excitement for certain things that are not as pertinent, while avoiding writing about the actual topic of my paper.  I want to focus on the fun details of Gloucester, her traditions and culture, her beautiful nature, and the countless writers, poets, artists, and inventors who have taken inspiration from her, and made Gloucester their home.  I want to talk about my experiences as a Gloucester resident, but I worry about biases.  I find myself wanting to write about overarching attitudes towards tourism, but stop myself as I wonder if these experiences are universal, or if they are only shared amongst me and my circle of friends and family.  


In writing this paper, I want to incorporate many different perspectives from people who are closest to the topic.  I think the best way to do this is by interviewing people from the organizations I am focusing on.  Due to my deep personal connection to the topic, I am constantly worrying about unconscious biases, and considering how to be aware of them.  Professors have suggested that I try to find people I am not related to for interviews, and while I understand where they are coming from, in a place like Gloucester this is far easier said than done.  Gloucester is a very close-knit community with a culture that deeply values family connections.  It is not uncommon for families to stay in Gloucester for many generations, passing their connections to other families in town on to their descendants.  In conversations between two strangers from Gloucester, one can expect the topic to quickly turn to what family they belong to in search of a common relative, going back several generations just to claim the title of “cousin”.  All of this to say that while I may avoid interviewing those I know personally at Cape Ann Museum, Maritime Gloucester, Gloucester 400, and the St. Peter’s Fiesta Committee, it is a challenge to avoid someone who knows me.  For even if they do not know Noelle Perry, they may know my family and have unconscious biases.  This is not to toot my own horn and imply that I come from some sort of exceptionally influential family with high social standing, this is simply the case for most people in Gloucester.  We are all connected, for better or worse.In the case of studying my own hometown, heritage, and community, achieving analytical distance is no easy task.  It begs the question, how do scholars study communities to which they belong?