In the first month of MUSE-489, Research Methods, I have
learned a surprising amount about how researchers employ a plethora of research
methodologies, how they create research questions, and what types of evidence
they collect. All of the authors contribute and craft their narratives in
differing ways. Two readings in particular have stood out to me this
semester in terms of how research methods– “Preserving the Voices of
Revolution: Examining the Creation and Preservation of a Subject-Centered
Collection of Tweets from the Eighteen Days in Egypt” and “ ‘I Know I’m Home
When I Have One:’ The Cultural Significance of the Garbage Plate of Rochester,
NY”. Both articles broke down the barriers of what I had believed a scholarly
article could be. Both approached new topics of interest in the 21st
century, digital curation and food culture, respectively.
A majority
of research articles that I have read often employ similar methods of
collecting data, such as surveys, academic research, and case study analysis.
Timothy Arnold and Walker Sampson, the authors of “Preserving the Voices of
Revolution: Examining the Creation and Preservation of a Subject-Centered
Collection of Tweets from the Eighteen Days in Egypt” present an alternative
method of collecting information and data in the 21st century,
Tweets. The authors sought to document
how to collect Tweets through Twitter’s Application Programming Interface (API)
and figure out the best way to preserve ephemeral artifacts such as Tweets. While
social media has been thoroughly examined in relation to riots and political
upheavals, it has not been documented. The authors pointed out that “few have
conducted rigorous content analysis simply because the content is unavailable
to scholars who do not have the ability to build tools to collect data from
Twitter”[1]. I
had never previously thought about Twitter as a medium to gather information
from or a methodology for collecting data. It seems unconventional since social
media is relatively new and its potential uses have not been harnessed
entirely. It inspires me to use creative methodologies for my own thesis
research though building an API might be a little lofty for my skill set.
Research
articles can either succeed or fail at hooking their audience with the abstract
alone. Emily Fekete managed to catch my attention immediately given that her
article,“ ‘I Know I’m Home When I Have One:’ The Cultural Significance of the
Garbage Plate of Rochester, NY”, is about an area that I have become extremely
fond of during my college years. As mentioned previously, food culture has
become quite topical in our society. This shift has resulted in people becoming
“foodies”, which means that people have an increased interest in what is on
their plate, where it came from, and what its backstory entails. Despite
Fekete’s article being easy to read, it lacked a sense of professionalism and
variance in the research methodologies employed. Her research question was to
figure out how the Garbage Plate was culturally connected to Rochesterians.
This in turn means that her target audience was all Rochestarians of varying
ages. By Fekete’s use of a Facebook survey through Survey Monkey and emailing
those individuals, she is instantly skewing a bias towards those 50 and under.
Older individuals do not frequent the Internet as often, let alone Facebook.
Through these research methodologies, she is not properly gathering the
opinions of a group that properly represents those that comprise Rochester’s
demographics. Because of this, her results are illegitimate in terms of
assessing the cultural value of the Garbage Plate to Rochester as a whole. Fekete
even acknowledges, “the survey results likely reflect a younger generation”[2]. Currently
my thesis idea does not require surveying individuals or emailing interviews to
obtain data. However if my topic was to include these methodologies, this
article has taught me that I would need to administer the survey in such a way
that was reflective of my target audience.
[1] Timothy Arnold and Walker Sampson, “Preserving
the Voices of Revolution: Examining the Creation and Preservation of a
Subject-Centered Collection of Tweets from the Egyptian Days in Egypt,” The
American Archivist 77, no. 2 (2014): 512.
[2] Emily Fekete “’I Know I’m Home When I Have One:’
The Cultural Significance of the Garbage Plate of Rochester, NY,” Journal
of Material Culture 46, no. 1 (2014): 34.
I also mentioned the lack of depth in Fekete's research -- I think you did a good job of looking at these articles critically.
ReplyDeleteA great contrast between these two studies, Jenna. It will be interesting to see how you incorporate some of these contemporary practices into your own research next semester.
ReplyDelete